Is Illumina the "duct tape" of sequencing?

Photo from Wikipedia.  Photo by Evan-Amos

For the last year or so I have become a big fan of Illumina sequencing.  We are using it for everything in the lab.  And many others are using it quite a lot too.  All sorts of interesting applications.  But of course -there are other sequencing systems that each have some advantages relative to Illumina.  And one of the key limitations of Illumina sequencing has been the read length (though that limitation gets less and less as read lengths get longer and longer from Illumina machines).

The UC Davis Genome Center has had Illumina sequencing systems for many years now and we use them extensively.  However, we felt for some time that we and others around town could benefit from complementary methods, especially those that could get longer reads.  So we sought funding to buy other systems.  And fortunately we got an NSF MRI grant to do just that -which we used to buy a Roche 454 Jr machine and contribute to the purchase of a Pacific Biosciences machine.  These are good to have around because they open up new windows into sequencing – not just long reads but other areas as well.  For example, the PacBio system also has the ability to use it to detect modifications to bases like methylation.

Alas, both the 454 and PacBio systems have higher error rates than the Illumina systems.  And this makes some analyses challenging and limits the benefits that come from the longer reads.  So what to do?  For a while people have been using Illumina sequencing to “correct” the errors make by 454 and PacBio sequencing.  And today Matt Herper at Forbes (For A New DNA Sequencer, A Technical Fix May Have Come Too Late – Forbes) discusses a new further improvement in the ability to do this error correction (a paper just came out on the topic from Adam Phillippy, Sergey Koren, Michael Schatz, and others).

I find this whole concept a bit funny / interesting.  Not only does Illumina sequencing have many uses but one of its uses in essence helps keep aloft the potential of some of it’s competitors.  In this way – Illumina can be considered the duct tape of sequencing systems.  1001 uses.  Not sure the Illumina folks will be overly thrilled with this use but that is the way it goes …

(As an aside – any high throughput highly accurate sequencing method could be used in the same way as Illumina in most cases – ABI solid for example.  But alas for ABI Illumina has kind of taken over this part of the market).

(An another aside – we will have to wait and see how/if the Ion Torrent systems take off in the sequencing ecosystem)

(As another aside – still waiting to see some more detail from the Oxford Nanopores folks … I would be happy to be a beta tester if anyone from Oxford is reading this).

Author: Jonathan Eisen

I am an evolutionary biologist and a Professor at U. C. Davis. (see my lab site here). My research focuses on the origin of novelty (how new processes and functions originate). To study this I focus on sequencing and analyzing genomes of organisms, especially microbes and using phylogenomic analysis

3 thoughts on “Is Illumina the "duct tape" of sequencing?”

  1. We're basically incorporating Illumina correction approach for any of our seq data that also has 454 or PacBio (we're testing out a number of tools for this purpose).


  2. Agree to your 'funny / interesting' comment – yet it could be argued that a complementary approach increases sequencing demand all around.

    That is, PacBio now becomes that much more useful for de novo sequencing, which Illumina alone would not be as useful, driving up the demand for de novo sequencing in general.

    The NGS market certainly is not a 'winner takes all' proposition, as accuracy and GC-bias in coverage will always make the blended approach (depending on the particular application of course) very attractive.

    BTW I love the duct tape analogy. Nothing like duct tape to save the world (and make a cool wallet too).


  3. bifold doors price

    To those who don't know what's Illumina here's a heads up. Illumina sequencing is based on imaging simultaneously millions of clusters of bridge-amplified single molecule fragments using flurorecent nucleotides and a reversible terminator-based sequencing chemistry to step through the base pairs. For short sequence reads, the approach has been determined to be highly robust and accurate. Applications in whole-genome association studies, expression analysis, and sequencing in addition to genome wide location studies have been reported. The short individual read lengths, from 50 to two 100 paired base pairs, has led to primary applications in re-sequencing. Paired-end reads generate long scaffolds and highly accurate contigs using multiple insert lengths with high library diversity. Using paired-end reads of 100 bases each permits mammalian-scale de novo assembly.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: