I have this cartoon of direct relevance to my crusade to end the use of badomics words. I have been trying to track where it came from for – like – ever. And though I did not want to post it without getting permission I have decided to do so to try and track it’s source. Here it is
I note – I tried using Google Image search (see a discussion of how to do this here) and it finds some other versions of this cartoon online but none of them have a source for it either.
So – does anyone out there know where this came from?
hmm…
a google search for the text yields this:
http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/0211/43.htm
LikeLike
interesting … for some reason my google search with the text did not find that … but I would bet the cartoon went with that article
thanks
LikeLike
I always thought it was when your acronym was used in papers, sans citation (PCR, BLAST, etc)
😉
The Other Jim
LikeLike
Referomics…citomics….no, no, that way lies madness!!
LikeLike
TinEye yields nothing:
http://www.tineye.com/search/a17c7dd5eb0e10dcfbe86427afc9763230423fbe/
Igor
LikeLike
This comment has been removed by the author.
LikeLike
funny that the crusade to end the use of bad-omics has become c-omics
LikeLike
Having something named after you. Smith-Waterman algorithm. Dayhoff matrix. Krebs cycle. Mendelian inheritance. And, of course, eisenomics http://eisenomics.wordpress.com/
LikeLike
One I am waiting to see is “fam-omics”…as we're seeing that, at least for now, taking a good family history is about as informative as any genome wide scan for complex diseases
LikeLike
Did you use Google images?
LikeLike
I recently went to a talk on “extracellular matridomics”: the study of all the components of the extracellular matrix. (So why not just say that you study the extracellular matrix?)
LikeLike