NCBI. Why? Why? Why is the default database for blasting "human G+T"

It is the little things.  The little things that can sometimes eat at you.  And here is one of my little pet peeves.  At some point – not sure how recently – NCBI changed the default database for Blastn searching to the “human G+T” database.  This Db contains human genomic and transcriptomic data.

Now – I am extremely grateful for many – if not most – of the things NCBI does.  Pubmed is great.  Pubmed Central rocks.  Sequence databases galore.  And all sorts of widgets and tools associated with sequence analysis.  Including a free blast server.  Which I use a lot.  But why? why is human G+T the default database for blastn searches?  Why?  I never only want to search this Db.  Why not have the non redundant Db of everything be the default?  Are there really that many people who only want to search human G+T?  Or is this some ploy to force people to do such searches?  This tiny little thing.  This setting.  This glitch.  Whatever it is.  It drives me batty …

Author: Jonathan Eisen

I am an evolutionary biologist and a Professor at U. C. Davis. (see my lab site here). My research focuses on the origin of novelty (how new processes and functions originate). To study this I focus on sequencing and analyzing genomes of organisms, especially microbes and using phylogenomic analysis

8 thoughts on “NCBI. Why? Why? Why is the default database for blasting "human G+T"”

  1. They changed this awhile ago. I often use this questionable choice to my advantage when assigning homework or test questions to students by giving them a mystery sequence and seeing how many think/remember to check the specific database being searched when they do a blast search.


  2. I wonder how much that default reduces their server load. As tintmylf says, most people don't think about the default. If all those are just blasting against human, its probably a lot less intensive than mindlessly searching nr.


  3. Talking about nr, I found recently a “funny” information there :
    Nucleotide Sequence Databases
    All GenBank + RefSeq Nucleotides + EMBL + DDBJ + PDB sequences (excluding HTGS0,1,2, EST, GSS, STS, PAT, WGS). No longer “non-redundant”.
    OK, NCBI: could you change this misleading name please? Something like “anr” (almost non-redundant”)…


  4. Absolutely agree. Another pet peeve: default on for the “mask low complexity region” flag. I don't want my searches masked unless I ask for it. If they want to return BOTH the masked and unmasked versions, fine, but when a search fails JUST BECAUSE the sequence was masked, it is REALLY ANNOYING.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: