Well, this just leaves a bad taste in my mouth: Oral Bacteria Create a ‘Fingerprint’ in Your Mouth. Basically, the researchers compared microbial diversity in the oral microbiome of people and they looked at how correlated the microbiome was with ethnicity. And they published a PLOS One paper and wrote a press release about it. And there are many lines in the PR and some in the paper I take issue with. These include:
- PR: “The most important point of this paper is discovering that ethnicity-specific oral microbial communities may predispose individuals to future disease”.
- Uggh. I cannot find anything anywhere that indicates anything about predisposition to disease
- PR: “Nature appears to win over nurture in shaping these communities,” Kumar noted, because African Americans and whites had distinct microbial signatures despite sharing environmental exposures to nutrition and lifestyle over several generations.
- Double uggh. So – different ethnic groups have different microbes. And since some of the ethnic groups have similar environmental exposures to each other (actually, they do not even test this – they simply assume this) yet do not have similar micro biomes, therefore the cause of the differences in the microbiomes must be genetic differences between the ethnic groups.
- Paper: “Our data demonstrates that ethnicity exerts a selection pressure on the oral microbiome, and that this selection pressure is genetic rather than environmental, since the two ethnicities that shared a common food, nutritional and lifestyle heritage (Caucasians and African Americans) demonstrated significant microbial divergence.”
- Triple uggh. This should not have been allowed in the paper. Their work in no way demonstrates any genetic component to the differences in the microbiome.
This is certainly a case of overselling the microbiome. But it is also a case of just bad science in relation to the “nature vs. nurture” issues.