Painful, kind of hilarious, typesetting error in a #PLOSOne paper from my lab – should I try to get it fixed?

Saw this tweet:

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
So I went and found the paper.

Wu D, Jospin G, Eisen JA (2013) Systematic Identification of Gene Families for Use as “Markers” for Phylogenetic and Phylogeny-Driven Ecological Studies of Bacteria and Archaea and Their Major Subgroups. PLoS ONE 8(10): e77033. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077033

And discovered what he was pointing to

Then I looked at the Pubmed Central version of the paper and it was the same.  So I wnet and found the arXiv version of the paper and it looked correct.

So apparently, PLOS One somehow replaced “nonmember” with


Brutal.  And even worse, this may have been there all along and I missed it.  So I responded:

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js And then Michael Hall pointed out another mistake.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Aaargh.  And funny too.  So now the question I guess is – should I fix it? And if so, how do I do that?

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Author: Jonathan Eisen

I am an evolutionary biologist and a Professor at U. C. Davis. (see my lab site here). My research focuses on the origin of novelty (how new processes and functions originate). To study this I focus on sequencing and analyzing genomes of organisms, especially microbes and using phylogenomic analysis

One thought on “Painful, kind of hilarious, typesetting error in a #PLOSOne paper from my lab – should I try to get it fixed?”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: