Do we need naming regulations for computer software?

Well, just saw this new paper: BMC Bioinformatics | Full text | Bellerophon: a hybrid method for detecting interchromo-somal rearrangements at base pair resolution using next-generation sequencing data.  Seems potentially interesting.  But one part of it struck me as very awkward.  You see, there already is a Bellerophon software program used by many in my field: Bellerophon: a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments.  Seems like a very bad idea to have a new program with the same name as an existing (and still used) one in a similar general field (DNA sequence analysis).

This leads me to the following question – do we need some sort of naming guidelines or regulations for computer software?  We have all sorts of naming regulations and conventions for genes, for species, for other groups of taxa, and more.  Why not software tools?  But seriously, I don’t think we need such a thing – we just need people to use Google and to do a little searching before they invent / publish a software package in case it’s name is, well, already used.

Author: Jonathan Eisen

I am an evolutionary biologist and a Professor at U. C. Davis. (see my lab site here). My research focuses on the origin of novelty (how new processes and functions originate). To study this I focus on sequencing and analyzing genomes of organisms, especially microbes and using phylogenomic analysis

7 thoughts on “Do we need naming regulations for computer software?”

  1. This isn't the first time this has happened. Do you think there was a deliberate attempt to confuse people? I see the advantage of a naming convention would be that it would keep corporations from naming products that already exist as free software written by researchers for researchers.

    Here's my proposal: common names will be used for discussions and so-called “scientific names” will be used in code and in publications 😉

    Like

  2. Personal opinion/rant:
    We don't need naming conventions, we need to find a way to reduce the need to publish or perish, so that we can stop re-building software that does the same thing over and over again, and just make new modules.

    Can someone please perform a coup at all of the funding agencies to make it possible to get funding without your publication record being a primary driver of rankings of the merits of the team?

    Like

  3. I'm not sure there is really such naming regulations for taxa either. There are lots of conflicts, particularly between different groups of organisms: Coxiella can be the bacterium or a mollusc, for example…

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s