So the project is finally in full swing! After a couple of weeks of practice sampling and getting used to different protocols for extracting, purifying and amplifying the DNA, we have now moved on to working with our real samples. We have extracted DNA from 18 samples (includes replicates of 3) from the tropical tank and the cold water tank. Funnily, the hardest part of the project so far has been running gels. We initially hit a couple of problems such as thickness of the gel, a loose wire in a gel box and differences in loading buffers and dyes. However, now that Akshay is going to be coming in, hopefully he can give us a couple of hints from his experience from IGEM, cause god knows how many gels he had to make this summer 😛
Category: Misc.
Aquarium Blog Post 1 (#longoverdue)
So after a long and intense summer and first half of fall quarter, the iGEM international competition came and concluded. So now I get the chance to walk down the lab (towards the gel room!) a few more feet and start work on the aquarium project I am helping with in the Eisen Lab. I can now devote more time to the processes of the project, and not just be involved with going to retrive samples from the aquarium, and trying to figure out where we keep our Taq Polymerase. I will try and come in the lab in the next few days, and figure out the workflow and how to get this project going. I am very excited for the project as well as hoping for some actual success in our process. This is the first of many blog posts as well, so stay tuned for the next segment of our project!
Thank you interwebs: help proving fungi are cool
Well, am teaching three lectures this week on Fungal Diversity for BIS002C at UC Davis. And I decided tonight to ask the internet for help finding cool new stories on fungi. And boy did the internet come through in the clutch. Thanks internet. See Storification of Twitter and Facebook discussions below:
http://storify.com/phylogenomics/fungi-are-cool.js[View the story “Fungi are cool” on Storify]
Fungi are cool
Storified by Jonathan Eisen · Sun, Nov 04 2012 23:13:14
Quick post: nice microbial genomes database: MGBD (hat tip to Google Scholar Updates)
Just discovered this paper: MBGD update 2013: the microbial genome database for exploring the diversity of microbial world. Seems to be a useful microbial genomes database with some nice associated tools. Among the potentially useful features:
General Ortholog Table
Select your own organisms for a Custom Ortholog Table
Add your own genome in My MBGD Mode
And more. Anyway – worth checking out.
I note – I found out about this via Google Scholar Updates:
For more on Scholar Updates see here.
You win some, you lose some
Our project is starting to pick up! After our initial sampling/sequencing period, we realized that there is actual DNA we can work with from the tanks. This past week, we started our actual sample collecting from the tropical tank. We collected 3 sets of samples from the sediment, walls, and water. Throughout the week, we extracted the DNA and ran PCR on all 9 samples (plus one negative control). Today, we completed the gel electrophoresis and got some unpleasant results. Unfortunately, we couldn’t see the primer bands and the DNA bands didn’t show up like we thought they would. This means something went wrong in our PCR, but we don’t know if it was during PCR16SA or PCR16SB. Well, it’s back to the drawing board! Starting next week, we will be re-running the PCR on the 9 samples and possible collecting more samples from other tanks.
Although this week’s results were a bust, we know that there is definitely some DNA present that we can work with. I’m sure we’ll be finding some pretty cool things as we continue sampling and sequencing. 🙂
PhD Comics @phdcomics animated cartoon on #OpenAccess interview of me & Nick Shockey
I assume if you pay any attention to science satire/humor you are familiar with PhD Comics by Jorge Cham. If not, you must check it out. It is simply brilliant stuff. And thus I was completely floored when I was contacted about whether I wanted to be interviewed by Jorge for a video he was commissioned to make as part of Open Access week activities. I mean – I figging say no to almost everything these days but I said yes to this almost immediately. And so I did a phone interview with him and Nick Shockey from SPARC. And then Jorge worked his magic — and here it is.
Today’s "Overselling the microbiome award" Crohn’s Disease and Bacteria
Uggh. Just read this: Specific bacterial species may initiate, maintain Crohn’s. Basically it reports on a paper that showed a correlation between bacterial taxa and early Crohn’s disease. The paper makes a big deal out of showing a correlation in the severity of pediatric Crohn’s and the types of microbes found. Good. That is useful. But here is the thing. It is a $&*#($@(& correlation. They have NO IDEA if this is the result of the CD or the cause (or both). To go around pushing the idea that this is about bacteria initiating CD is misleading.
The news release says “The work may ultimately lead to treatment involving manipulation of the intestinal bacteria.” True. The work may ultimately also lead to my screaming. Oh wait. It did already.
For more on Overselling the Microbiome see some of my other posts
- Overselling the microbiome award: MedicalDaily on Effects of Sugary Drink
- The microbiome in the news: risk of overselling but not always bad coverage
- Overselling the microbiome award: Scientists look to mummies for obesity cure
- Probiotics are the new viagra & the risks of overselling of probiotics
- Probiotic use spreading, lots of money being made, known benefits still murky
- Overselling the microbiome award #2: The Marshall Protocol
- Overselling the microbiome award: Stephen Barrie on pre and probiotics at the Huffington Post
- Dubious Press Release from Cedars-Sinai linking Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and Bacteria in Gut
iTalk bug – help needed with partial / unclosed aiff file
Well, too long of a saga to post directly to Twitter so posting here.
Yesterday I recorded a review session for a class with iTalk https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/italk-recorder/id293673304?mt=8. I recorded it on my iPhone 4S.
When I got home to upload the file and to convert it to an MP3 to share with the class I discovered that it seemed to not be there in the iTalk file list.
I thought – maybe I never formally “saved” the file but maybe iTalk kept the recording somewhere.
So I opened up iTunes connected to my phone and there it was in the Apps file area
I then copied the file to my desktop and no matter what I do I cannot seem to open it and /or extract audio out of it. I have tried to open it a million ways with all sorts of desktop and online programs and nothing works. My guess is somehow the file was not closed out correctly and thus even though it is 430 Mb it is viewed as empty by all the programs I have tried.
Anyone know a solution for this?
I have posted the file to Dropbox here.
Important read: Biotechniques discussion of DNA extraction in microbial studies
Very quick post here. This is worth a read: BioTechniques – DNA Extraction: Overcoming Obstacles in Microbial Studies. From their summary:
“What are the most efficient methods to extract microbial DNA that accurately represents the community it is isolated from? Janelle Weaver reports on efforts to identify the best methods for DNA extraction from unknown frontiers in the human body and across the globe.”
It discusses among many things this fascinating paper: Flores GE, Henley JB, Fierer N (2012) A Direct PCR Approach to Accelerate Analyses of Human-Associated Microbial Communities. PLoS ONE 7(9): e44563. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044563
Note – I found out about this on the Twitter
@dr_bik @noahfierer Great paper. We wrote about this paper and similar efforts in a #metagenomics feature this month: bit.ly/RJytjr
— BioTechniques (@MyBioTechniques) October 18, 2012
//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
On a related note see the paper from my lab on a metagenomic simulation we did a few years ago …
Sampling, DNA extraction, and PCR, OH MY!
For the past week, we’ve been doing preliminary sampling, as well as some DNA extractions and PCR on samples from the saltwater and freshwater flasks of water that we filtered and the wall and protein skimmer from the saltwater tank. Those four samples have now been through PCR. Although we found DNA, but the gel prepared after the PCR failed. We also went back to the tanks to gather samples from a saltwater tank that is soon to be broken up to create two coral ponds.



