3/9 at #UCDavis: Workshop: Authorship and the Promises of Digital Dissemination


Wednesday, March 9, 4:00- 5:45 pm

UC Davis School of Law, King Hall, Rm 2100A

A cross-disciplinary panel discussion on authorship in the digital age, with a focus on the specific goals and needs of academic authorsAuthors who write to be read care about how their works are published and what that means for reader access. While traditional options and copyright arrangements still predominate in many fields, there are ever-increasing ways to share works of authorship. What works best to get textual and visual works out there and under what circumstances? Join us for this panel discussion with Authors Alliance, where we will explore the opportunities and challenges authors face in maximizing the reach of their work, both in and outside of academia.

Mario Biagioli (Law, STS)
Stephanie Boluk (English)
Jonathan Eisen (Biology)
Alexandra Lippman (STS)
Rick Prelinger (UCSC and director of the Prelinger Archive)
Kim Stanley Robinson (Mars Trilogy)
Pam Samuelson (Authors Alliance)
MacKenzie Smith (Library)
Madhavi Sunder (Law)

Registration Open for Data Rights & Data Wrongs workshop, 12/10 at #UCDavis

Data Rights & Data Wrongs

A workshop organized by
Innovating Communication in Scholarship (ICIS)

University of California, Davis

Date & Time: December 10, 2014 from 9:00 am – 5:00 pm

Location: MPR, Student Community Center, UC Davis

Register: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/data-rights-data-wrongs-tickets-14079810091

Full Agenda: http://icis.ucdavis.edu/?page_id=329

Keynote talks:
Dr. Christine Borgman, Professor & Presidential Chair, iSchool, UCLA
John Wilbanks, Chief Commons Officer, Sage Bionetworks

Scholars are increasingly subject to pressures from funding bodies, disciplinary norms, professional and personal ethics, and institutional directives to share their research data and make it available for reuse. There is, however, a great deal of heterogeneity across the research enterprise with respect to what is meant by ‘data’ and ‘data sharing,’ why data sharing is deemed important, and what data management strategies are considered most effective. Moreover, data are often difficult and costly to produce and share. Therefore, many scholars view these as a significant product of their intellectual labor for which they should receive some sort of credit towards tenure and promotion, authorial recognition through citation, or financial compensation. While balancing all of these considerations is desirable to promote increased access to data, it is difficult to guarantee that the concerns of all research stakeholders will be met given (1) the diverse forms that data can take, as well as the mobility and malleability of data given widespread access to new information technologies, (2) the complex and variable legal status of data as not-quite/not-always property, and (3) the ethical considerations and legal restrictions implicated in the sharing and reuse of data related to sensitive topics such as personal health information, national security, and vulnerable populations. This workshop will address theoretical concerns and pragmatic solutions that can be harnessed to help researchers comply with requirements or desires to share their data in ways they deem appropriate for their goals.

11_07 Data Rights flyer.pdf

A year ago, I came up with a great acronym for our project – ICIS – what do I do now?

About a year ago, when we starting meeting and discussing our new project on the future of scholarly communications, we decided it would be important to have a title and if possible a brief acronym. Now – I love coming up with such project names and acronyms and think I have done a good job with such tasks in the past.  Somehow I wanted to find a cool acronym for a project on scholarly communication, and publishing, and openness, and social media and more.  And I just could not come up with anything great.  

And this was starting to get semi urgent since we had a meeting coming up and needed to make a web site and needed names and titles and such.  So the group of us involved in the project (myself, Mackenzie Smith and Mario Biagioli) started sending around ideas to each other. Among the ideas first proposed:

  • IFHA Innovating Academic Publishing Project
  • The UC Davis IFHA project on Innovating Academic Publishing” with a project acronym of IAP

But I did not like this so I started doodling:

Screenshot 2014-10-23 14.36.48

Screenshot 2014-10-23 14.35.45

So I compiled some ideas and sent around a list

  • ISP: Innovating Scholarly Publishing
  • iSP: Innovating Scholarly Publishing
  • i2SP: Innovations in Scholarly Publishing  (with the 2 being a superscript)
  • i2AP: Innovations in Academic Publishing  (with the 2 being a superscript)
  • i2SP2: Innovations in Scholarly Publishing Project  (with the 2 being a superscript)
  • i2AP2: Innovations in Academic Publishing Project  (with the 2 being a superscript)
  • IN-A-PUB: Innovating Academic Publishing
  • SP2.0: Scholarly Publishing 2.0

Other ideas circulated (some mine, some others)

  • LIAP: Lab for Innovating Scholarly Communication, pronounced LEAP?
  • Innovating Academic Communication – IACOM
  • Innovating Academic Publishing – IAPUB
  • Innovating Scholarly Publishing – ISPUB
  • Innovating Scholarly Communication – ISCOM or INSCOM
  • COMMIS: communications innovation in scholarship

And then I came up with one I loved and sent around a suggestion:

“ok here is my favorite so far – innovating communication in scholarship – ICIS (pronounced isis —)”

Other ideas circulated:

  • pubs 2.0
  • innopubs
  • scholar 2.0

But I said I still liked ICIS best and, well, it won.  Yay.  We had a project name.   And we used it for our meetings and our website: icis.ucdavis.edu.  I was so proud of this name.  It sounded nice.  It conjured up images of ISIS the Goddess.  And every time we discussed the project I could remember the struggle to come up with a name and how happy I was when it came to me.

And then the ICIS name got, well, polluted.  Or, at least, the sound of the name got polluted by the group known variously as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (aka ISIL), Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (aka ISIS).  And though I would hope it would be clear that our ICIS project is not connected in any way to ISIL/ISIS.  But yet, when I mention the project name to people, I invariable get some comment.  And Alison Fish, the first post doc working on the project just told me that she also gets some murmuring when she mentions the name during talks.

So we are in the midst of our annual retreat for the project now.  We have six people working on the project – myself, Mario Biagioli, Mackenzie Smith, Allison Fish, Alessandro Delfanti, and Alexandra Lippman.  And we all liek the ICIS name but are not sure what to do now?  So – in the interest of openness and communication I proposed to everyone (and they at least seemed to agree) that it might be good to ask the broader community for input here.

So – any suggestions?  What do you recommend we do?  Should we change the name?  Change how we say it?  Should we stick to our name and pronunciation?  And ideas, thoughts, or suggestions would be welcome.

Curating a Storify About this