Just a quick follow up to my recent post on How did I miss this? The botrytized wine microbiome … from #UCDavis colleague David Mills. There is a similar paper from the same group also in PLoS One from about the same time: PLOS ONE: Brewhouse-Resident Microbiota Are Responsible for Multi-Stage Fermentation of American Coolship Ale. What a job — microbes, ales and wines, and sequencing. One of the few times when reading a paper where I have said “I wish that was me doing that work.” … must look into getting involved in such studies …
Author: Jonathan Eisen
How did I miss this? The botrytized wine microbiome … from #UCDavis colleague David Mills
![]() |
| From here. |
Fun use of next generation sequencing in this paper: PLOS ONE: Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals Significant Bacterial Diversity of Botrytized Wine. They used sequencing to characterize the diversity of microbes associated with botrytized wine (wine produced from grapes infected with the mold Botrytis cinerea. They focused in particular on Dolce wine (not 100% sure what this is but I think it is wine from the Dolce winery …). And they focused in particular on the bacteria associated with this wine as it was being produced. Anyway … I am no food/drink microbiologist .. but this seems cool.
Overselling the microbiome award of the month: Integrative medical group of Irvine
Wow. Just discovered this site: Fecal Transplantation | Integrative Medical Group of Irvine. Not sure how long it has been out there. But this is one of the more aggressive and perhaps egregious overselling of the power of the human microbiome that I have seen. They are promoting fecal transplants at their clinic as a way to cure a diverse array of ailments from ulcerative colitis to obesity and imply they can be used for cardiovascular health, emotional status, bone health, and more. My “favorite” part:
As our understanding of the enormous importance of bowel micro-biota (bacteria) grows, the indications for fecal transplant will expand greatly and public acceptance will follow. But there is no reason for you to wait. Dr. Lee, our naturopathic doctor, is one of only a tiny handful of specialists certified in the use of fecal transplant. She can expertly manage your case.
Yes that is right. We (the royal We of course) are on the verge of showing that the microbiota does EVERYTHING and therefore, if anything ails you, just wash your troubles away with some shit from a relative. There is no reason to wait. Come in to our clinic now.
And for the misleading nature of this site, I am giving this Integrative Medical Group of Irvine my coveted “Overselling the microbiome award.” Previous winners and discussions of this issue are listed below:
- Overselling the microbiome award: MedicalDaily on Effects of Sugary Drink
- The microbiome in the news: risk of overselling but not always bad coverage
- Overselling the microbiome award: Scientists look to mummies for obesity cure
- Probiotics are the new viagra & the risks of overselling of probiotics
- Overselling the microbiome award #2: The Marshall Protocol
- Overselling the microbiome award: Stephen Barrie on pre and probiotics at the Huffington Post
Teaching kept me from SF Giants playoff games; StubHub glitches are keeping me from my money ..
Well, as if not going to the game wasn’t bad enough …
A few weeks ago, I managed to buy some tickets to some San Francisco Giants playoff games (for the League Championship Series and the World Series). Alas, due to teaching activities for Intro Bio at UC Davis, I was unable to go (when I bought them the dates were not yet determined). I gave some to a neighbor (a belated thank you for them allowing construction workers to use their driveway and yard for months when we had a pool built last summer). And then I sold the others on StubHub. Generally I have always loved Stubhub. Great way to get tickets. Had never sold any there before but it was pretty smooth and painless (except for the relatively large commission but that is another story) and the tickets sold fast (I listed them at ticket price).
And then I waited to payment to go to my Paypal account. And waited. And waited. I finally wrote to StubHub
“Just trying to find out why it is taking so long to get payment from something from a few weeks ago”
The response was surprising:
Dear Jonathan,
Thank you for contacting StubHub.
I understand your concern regarding your payment. I’m sorry it has been delayed. We recently experienced a technical error where MLB payments were diverted to ‘Credit My Team Account’. We are in the process of correcting these orders and issuing payments to the default payment method in the sellers account. Due to the widespread nature of this issue, it is taking longer than normal to change the payment method, as each one needs to be done manually. Unfortunately at this point, I am unable to give you a timeframe for receiving your PayPal payment. Rest assured we are working as quickly as possible on this issue.
I apologize for the inconvenience, but appreciate your business with StubHub. Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
Kim
StubHub Customer Service
Weekdays: 5:00AM — 9:00PM (PST)
Weekends: 6:00AM — 7:00PM (PST)
customerservice@stubhub.com
www.StubHub.com
Wow. Glad they are trying to explain what was going on. But just how hard can it be to correct such an error?
So I waited again. And waited. And then I got an email with the subject line “Payments Returned to StubHub – 11/06/2012.” Sounded good. Until I looked at the email.
Important & neglected aspect of lab studies of animals : effect of habitat change on microbiome
![]() |
| By Aaron Logan via Wikipedia |
Very very interesting paper came out recent from some colleagues at UC Davis: PLOS ONE: Routine Habitat Change: A Source of Unrecognized Transient Alteration of Intestinal Microbiota in Laboratory Mice
Abstract: The mammalian intestine harbors a vast, complex and dynamic microbial population, which has profound effects on host nutrition, intestinal function and immune response, as well as influence on physiology outside of the alimentary tract. Imbalance in the composition of the dense colonizing bacterial population can increase susceptibility to various acute and chronic diseases. Valuable insights on the association of the microbiota with disease critically depend on investigation of mouse models. Like in humans, the microbial community in the mouse intestine is relatively stable and resilient, yet can be influenced by environmental factors. An often-overlooked variable in research is basic animal husbandry, which can potentially alter mouse physiology and experimental outcomes. This study examined the effects of common husbandry practices, including food and bedding alterations, as well as facility and cage changes, on the gut microbiota over a short time course of five days using three culture-independent techniques, quantitative PCR, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) and next generation sequencing (NGS). This study detected a substantial transient alteration in microbiota after the common practice of a short cross-campus facility transfer, but found no comparable alterations in microbiota within 5 days of switches in common laboratory food or bedding, or following an isolated cage change in mice acclimated to their housing facility. Our results highlight the importance of an acclimation period following even simple transfer of mice between campus facilities, and highlights that occult changes in microbiota should be considered when imposing husbandry variables on laboratory animals.
I personally think that we as a community are going to have to come to grips with the fact that the microbial communities in / on research organisms (of all kinds) may have a profound effect on experimental results. This may explain many of the differences seen in experiments between facilities or over time within a facility. In general, I think either controlling the microbes more carefully in lab experiments (e.g., using defined flora) or at least monitoring them is going to be very important to best interpret studies of plants and animals in the lab (or for that matter – in the field too). Anyway -this paper is a tiny window into one of the ways that controlling for microbiomes may be important in lab studies.
Citation: Ma BW, Bokulich NA, Castillo PA, Kananurak A, Underwood MA, et al. (2012) Routine Habitat Change: A Source of Unrecognized Transient Alteration of Intestinal Microbiota in Laboratory Mice. PLoS ONE 7(10): e47416. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047416
Guest post on "CHANCE" ChIP-seq QC and validation software
Guest post by Aaron Diaz from UCSF on a software package called CHANCE which is for ChIP-seq analyses. Aaron wrote to me telling me about the software and asking if I would consider writing about it on my blog. Not really the normal topic of my blog but it is open source and published in an open access journal and is genomicy and bioinformaticy in nature. So I wrote back inviting him to write about it. Here is his post:
CHANCE: A comprehensive and easy-to-use graphical software for ChIP-seq quality control and validation

Our recent paper presents CHANCE a user-friendly software for ChIP-seq QC and protocol optimization. Our user-friendly graphical software quickly estimates the strength and quality of immunoprecipitations, identifies biases, compares the user’s data with ENCODE’s large collection of published datasets, performs multi-sample normalization, checks against qPCR-validated control regions, and produces publication ready graphical reports. CHANCE can be downloaded here.
|
An overview of ChIP-seq: cross-
linked chromatin is sheared,
enriched for a transcription factor
or epigenetic mark of interest
using an antibody, purified and
sequenced.
|
Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) is a powerful tool for constructing genome wide maps of epigenetic modifications and transcription factor binding sites. Although this technology enables the study of transcriptional regulation with unprecedented scale and throughput interpreting the resulting data and knowing when to trust the data can be difficult. Also, when things go wrong it is hard to know where to start when troubleshooting. CHANCE provides a variety of tests to help debug library preparation protocols.
One of the primary uses of CHANCE is to check the strength of the IP. CHANCE produces a summary statement which will give you an estimate of the percentage of the IP reads which map DNA fragments pulled down by the antibody used for the ChIP. In addition to the size of this signal component within the IP CHANCE reports the fraction of the genome these signal reads cover, as well as the statistical significance of the genome wide percentage enrichment relative to control in the form of a q-value (positive false discovery rate). CHANCE has been trained on CHIP-seq experiments from the ENCODE repository by making over 10,000 Input to IP and Input to replicate Input comparisons. The q-value reported gives then the fraction of comparisons between Input sample techinical replicates that report an enrichment for signal in one sample compared to another equal to the user provided sample or greater. CHANCE identifies insufficient sequencing depth, PCR amplification bias in library preparation, and batch effects.
CHANCE identifies biases in sequence content and quality, as well as cell-type and laboratory-dependent biases in read density. Read-density bias reduces the statistical power to distinguish subtle but real enrichment from background noise. CHANCE visualizes base-call quality and nucleotide frequency with heat maps. Furthermore, efficient techniques borrowed from signal processing uncover biases in read density caused by sonication, chemical digestion, and library preparation.
![]() |
| A typical IP enrichment report. |
CHANCE cross-validates enrichment with previous ChIP-qPCR results. Experimentalists frequently use ChIP-qPCR to check the enrichment of positive control regions and the background level of negative control regions in their IP DNA relative to Input DNA. It is thus important to verify whether those select regions originally checked with PCR are captured correctly in the sequencing data. CHANCE’s spot-validation tool provides a fast way to perform this verification. CHANCE also compares enrichment in the user’s experiment with enrichment in a large collection of experiments from public ChIP-seq databases.
![]() |
| CHANCE has a user friendly graphical interface. |
![]() |
| How CHANCE might be used to provide feedback on protocol optimization. |
Marine Microbial Ecology Summer Course in Sydney during February 2013
See attachment for details.
Germophobia 101: there are microbes on pacifiers; therefore pacifiers cause atherosclerosis & diabetes
Oh my God. I hope upon hope that the quote in this story was unintended. The story is from US News and World Report: Dirty Pacifiers May Make Infants Sick: Study – US News and World Report
It is excruciatingly painful to read. First, the headline is misleading and way out of line. US News should be reprimanded for this. There is no evidence presented that pacifiers are making anyone sick.
What is the story about? At a conference someone(s) presented results of taking used and new pacifiers and chopping them up and seeing what grew on different parts. And they found – get ready – microbes on them. And more microbes on the used ones than the new ones. And they even found some microbes that were apparently resistant to antibiotics.
Scared yet? You shouldn’t be because of course Fortunately the story does quote on sane person
Dr. Ben Hoffman, medical director of the Children’s Safety Center at Oregon Health and Science University’s Doernbecher Children’s Hospital, said he can’t think of an infection a child has had that he would attribute to a pacifier.
“The majority of things you’re going to find on a pacifier are things we’ll find on our clothes, normal human flora,” said Hoffman. “It’s not a reason to demonize pacifiers if people find them useful.”
But alas it also quotes the lead author of the study.
Glass doesn’t recommend that parents use pacifiers to calm their babies and toddlers. “After doing the study, I say why take a risk? The key is to recognize that pacifiers can cause illness,” he said. “In the long run, it may be that what you do now [using a pacifier] may have a lot to do with whether a child ends up developing atherosclerosis or type 2 diabetes.”
What? The? Fu$*#? Pacifiers have microbes on them. Therefore they cause atherosclerosis and diabetes? Completely, unbelievably insane and irresponsible. And I think US News should have made it clearer that this is just completely out of line.
Thank you interwebs: help proving fungi are cool
Well, am teaching three lectures this week on Fungal Diversity for BIS002C at UC Davis. And I decided tonight to ask the internet for help finding cool new stories on fungi. And boy did the internet come through in the clutch. Thanks internet. See Storification of Twitter and Facebook discussions below:
http://storify.com/phylogenomics/fungi-are-cool.js[View the story “Fungi are cool” on Storify]
Fungi are cool
Storified by Jonathan Eisen · Sun, Nov 04 2012 23:13:14
Quick post: nice microbial genomes database: MGBD (hat tip to Google Scholar Updates)
Just discovered this paper: MBGD update 2013: the microbial genome database for exploring the diversity of microbial world. Seems to be a useful microbial genomes database with some nice associated tools. Among the potentially useful features:
General Ortholog Table
Select your own organisms for a Custom Ortholog Table
Add your own genome in My MBGD Mode
And more. Anyway – worth checking out.
I note – I found out about this via Google Scholar Updates:
For more on Scholar Updates see here.










